3 thoughts on “What’s wrong with this? Part 2

  1. I needed to turn this into a hands on problem to understand it. The easiest way to do that was to cut a square piece of paper to match the very last drawing including the placement of dots. Then I worked backwards to get to the first drawing. I started with a square and I really did end with a square similar to the first picture. There’s was still a problem, but I’ll let others figure out what it is for themselves first.

  2. It makes a fantastic hands on investigation. By varying the angle of the lines crossing through the centre it affects the size of the missing piece. Advanced students can even use some trigonometry to devise a formula that relates the angle to the size of hole (and even the overall change in the puzzle size). Some configurations are more deceptive than others.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s